Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 06:36

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are some best sources of great porn?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Royal Caribbean crew members shares onboard secrets - TheStreet
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
SEC clears Trump Media filing, opening door to multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin buy - The Block
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Former Player Gives Definitive Verdict on Knicks Firing Tom Thibodeau - Athlon Sports
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Chevy Teases a New Corvette 'X' to Debut Next Week - Road & Track
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
AI could solve puzzles posed by twin stars in 'mere minutes or seconds on a single laptop' - Space
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Leon Kennedy "actually quite a bad match for horror," says Resident Evil 9's director - Eurogamer